Select Page
Apple iPhone stolen device feature

Apple iPhone stolen device feature

RGCS of Ediburgh has reported in their newsletter that Apple IPhone users are being urged to use a new feature called ‘Stolen Device Protection’ which was rolled out in a recent update to IOS.

You should take notice of this if you use an iPhone or if your employees use iPhones, whether you supply them or not. It can help prevent someone who has stolen your device and knows your passcode from gaining access and using it. It’s designed to provide additional security when your iPhone is away from familiar locations that you designate, such home and work. The feature protects by factors such as security delay and the need to authenticate by Face ID or Touch ID before certain actions can be taken on the device.

It’s an opt-in feature that can be turned on in Settings. It however requires the use of two-factor authentication for your Apple ID and setting up or enabling: a device passcode; Face ID or Touch ID; Find MY; and Significant Locations.

If everyone’s working, who’s managing to prevent crises?

If everyone’s working, who’s managing to prevent crises?

I believe that it was Zig Ziglar (1926 – 2012) who talked about working on your business rather than working in your business. He was making the point in the context of growing a business. More recently, I re-read an article I’d kept on file in which the same on-your-business-not-in-your-business point was raised in the context of a textile screen printing shop.

The article started out being about a shop with a printing probelm.They were dealing with a deadline order to print in white on burgundy nylon running shorts that they discovered were actually polyester shorts when the dye bled into the print. This led to to a closer examination of why this was allowed to happen and how the shop was being run. A list of management problems were unearthed in the process:

  • A production manager running the press, leaving nobody to manage the production or run the shop.
  • A poor screen-coating technique.
  • A high temperature in the shop at around 49 Celsius.
  • Accepting the job with too tight a deadline with no time allowed for dealing with problems.
  • No standard operating procedure for minimizing problems.
  • Poorly trained production staff.

Unfortunately, this is quite common in the industry. How does your shop stack up against this list of management problems? is someone managing to prevent crises?

A changed opinion of passwords

A changed opinion of passwords

I recently had my website developer install Wordfence, a website security service for WordPress sites. We’re trying out the free version at the moment on an e-commerce website I own and I’ve just received the first weekly report. To say that it was an eye opener would be to understate it’s impact.

The report on attacks from numbers of IPs, originating countries, and failed logins that Wordfence blocked and listed was astounding—they numbered in the hundreds. I would never have guessed the extent of nefarious activity out there. I asked our website host what the impact of this activity would have been before we engaged Wordfence. “Nothing, the sites we host are “hardened” which means that we lock down security. What Wordfence does that we cannot do as quickly, is stop attacks on plugins in which someone has found a vulnerability. WordPress plugin exploits are the number one way sites get hacked.”

But it was the answer to my question about why there had been 165 failed attempts to log in using my name and hundreds using speculative usernames like “admin”, “test”, “guest”, “username”, “123456789”, and others. “That is people trying to guess the passwords for the accounts. This is common and why passwords should be complex.”

So, I’ve changed my attitude to complex passwords. I’ve resolved to stop regarding them as a nuisance and to make sure that I follow the advice about changing passwords regularly and making them as random, unpredictable, and complex as possible. I urge you to as well. And perhaps consider a website security service—it’s rough out there in cyberspace.

Oh well.

Oh well.

So, the glitter and microplastic issue continues!

A few months ago I contacted the textile and apparel editor of a prominent printing industry online magazine and explained my quest to persuade textile screen printers to stop using glitter. She agreed to publish an article on the topic. I considered such an article about the glitter and microplastic problem in a prominent industry magazine a breakthrough, especially as another industry magazine chooses to turn a blind eye and still irresponsibly publishes articles promoting glitter prints.

The article was published. Unfortunately, it did little for my quest though and was actually disappointing for three main reasons.

First disappointment: After accurately listing the ecological problems associated with traditional aluminum and plastic glitter, she inaccurately suggested using “biodegradable” alternatives from two German manufacturers. I checked out their websites. One of the manufacturers makes a polyester glitter which is also a microplastic problem, and the other makes a plant-based glitter only for face and body applications specifically for the “party scene”—it has nothing at all to do with the textile industry.

Second disappointment: A footnote to the article says that the author wrote it with the assistance of Google’s Bard, an AI platform. Clearly, she did no research into the manufacturers Bard incorrectly included, thereby undermining the credibility of her article.

Third disappointment: When I pointed all of this out to her, the response was, “Oh well.”  That’s it. No apology or correction offered. Just. “Oh well.”

The quest continues, but in the meantime, we’ve learned a couple of things from this exercise. First, so far there appears to be no legitimate “biodegradable” alternative to plastic and aluminum glitter and it’s hard to see how there could ever be—to be “biodegradable” the glitter would have to be water soluble, which makes it unsuited to any garment that has to be washed. And second, it’s probably a good idea to be a little skeptical about what we read in industry magazines, especially if it’s written with the assistnce of AI.

Who’s really your customer and what do they actually want?

Who’s really your customer and what do they actually want?

Who’s really your customer and what do they actually want? How much have you paused and contemplated that question?

Here is an of excerpt from Seth Godin’s book, This is Marketing, to demonstrate why you should contemplate the question as it relates to your business . . .

“Americans spent more than twenty-four billion dollars on dog food last year. The average price has has skyrocketed, and so has the gourmet nature of ingredients, like sweet potatoes, elk, and free-range bison..

And yet, I’ve never seen a dog buy dog food.

Have you?

Dog food might be getting more delicious as it gets more expensive, but we actually have no idea. We have no clue whether dogs enjoy it more, because we’re not dogs.

But we can be sure that the dog owners like it more.

Because dog food is for dog owners. It’s for the way it makes them feel, the satisfaction of taking care of an animal the responds with loyalty and affection, the status of buying a luxury good, and the generosity of sharing it.

Some dog owners want to spend more on the dog food they buy. Some want gluten-free dog food, loaded with high-value placebos.

But lets not get confused about who all this innovation is for. It’s not for the dogs.

It is for us.

A marketer for a dog food company might decide that the secret of more dog food sales is to make a food that tastes better. But that requires understanding how a dog thinks, which is awfully difficult.

It turns out that the right formula is to make a dog food that dog owners want to buy.”

Who’s really your customer and what do they actually want?